Thursday, 31 March 2011
The Digital Economy Act
The Act's provisions against the act of copyright infringement proved controversial.[2] It establishes a system of law which aims to first increase the ease of tracking down and suing persistent infringers, and after a minimum of one year permit the introduction of "technical measures" to reduce the quality of, or potentially terminate, those infringers' Internet connections. It also creates a new ex-judicial process to handle appeals.[3]
The new process, which will come into force when Ofcom's regulatory code is approved by Parliament, begins with rightsholders gathering lists of Internet Protocol addresses which they believe have infringed their copyrights. (This data could be gathered most easily by a rightsholder connecting to a Peer-to-Peer download of a work they own, and noting the other IP addresses to which their computer connects.) They would then send each IP number to the appropriate Internet Service Provider (newly-defined in the Act as a provider of IP addresses[4]) along with a "copyright infringement report".
You will be a sent letter informing you that what you are doing is wrong. If you fail to stop downloading illegally, your internet may be slowed down by your providers or stopped entirely.
Friday, 18 March 2011
Charlie Leadbeater and We Think
Web 2.0 and Web 3.0
Monday, 7 March 2011
The Social Network
The Long Tail Theory
The Long Tail Theory was created by Chris Anderson in October 2004. The theory is based on the statement 'more of less, and less of more'. The theory expresses how businesses can make just as much money selling a large amount of niche products as they can selling the most wanted products at the time.
Friday, 4 March 2011
Wednesday, 2 March 2011
Wikinomics - The Five Big Ideas
A positive example of Peering would be Jessie J. She came to fame first by uploading videos of her singing her songs onto YouTube in order for people to hear her name, her music, and recomend her to others. People listened to her music because they didn't have to pay. If they did have to pay and hadn't heard of her before many people no doubt would not have paid much attention. After this Jessie J managed to make it big because of people talking about her and listening to her songs via the internet.
However when artists are famous, they are making a living through producing music. Like any of us, we have a job in order to make a living and none of us like working for nothing. Therefore when their music is being shared on the internet for free, the artists must feel they are working hard for nothing. This is an example of how Peering can be negative.
Free Creativity - An example of Free Creativity would be 'Life in a day: Ridley Scott Global Youtube Creativity'. This was where the film maker asked people to record themselves or things that happened during a certain day and uploaded all of the footage and created a film. This didn't cost the director anything as he relied on people to upload the footage which they had captured. All he had to do was piece the film together. This may have been free to produce and not made money but it will have shared his name around the world and his creation via the internet.
The media is democratised by peering, free creativity and the we media journalism produced by ordinary people.
An example of this can be The News. As a nation we can now send in our stories and pictures to The Newspapers and News channels on the television. This enables us to have the chance to be producing the news stories instead of the Editors and journalists feeding the news to us. Many years ago we could not comment on stories that were being produced within the media however now we can, expressing our own opinions. However this can take a negative toll as somebody will know doubt be controlling what comments can be accepted and which can't when people are broadcasting their feelings towards the article that has been produced. Therefore this could mean that comments could be deleted and filtered so that only certain comments can be seen in order to form a structure to the debate.